Reply to Visit-to-visit blood pressure variation: time to reanalyze all the data from the TROPHY study.
نویسندگان
چکیده
To the Editor: We are glad to see that 6 years after publication of the Trial of Preventing Hypertension (TROPHY), the results are still being debated. Only truly new and important findings can elicit such an interest. TROPHY reported more robust results in the first 2 than in the second 2 years of the study. Two years of treatment with candesartan produced a 66.3% relative risk reduction (RRR) of hypertension, and the treatment was well tolerated. At the end of year 4, the RRR in the group that had been switched from candesartan to placebo at year 2 was highly significant but clinically modest (15.6%). We stated that “we do not advocate treatment of 25 million people with prehypertension and that further studies are needed.” This call for action was a smashing success. The Short Treatment with the Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Candesartan Surveyed by Telemedicine (STAR CAST) study in Japan will analyze the reversal from stage 1 to prehypertension and is nearly completed. The CHINON study in China recruited 10,000 patients and will compare cardiovascular outcomes in active treatment and placebo groups. In Brazil the Hypertension Prevention in Pre-Hypertensive Individuals (PREVER) study evaluates the effect of diuretic treatment in patients with prehypertension who failed to respond to lifestyle modification. In the meantime, we responded to an early critique of TROPHY by reanalyzing data according to the Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7) definition of hypertension. In the reanalysis, all original findings were confirmed and the median time to hypertension as defined by JNC 7 was 4.0 years in the group previously randomized to candesartan. Thus, according to current standards for initiation of treatment, 50% of patients did not need to resume medication up to 2 years after cessation of a 2year course of candesartan. We are disappointed that this body of work had escaped Dr Schalkwyk’s and Turner’s attention. We have recently published a paper in this Journal on the measurement of visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure (BP) using data from the placebo arm of the TROPHY trial. This work was intended to investigate different approaches to the estimation of visit-to-visit variability, an active area of BP research. The authors of the letter note that the BP visit-to-visit variability is higher in treated compared with the untreated patients, referring to the results in Figure 1 of the article. Their observation is what one would expect when BP is treated; that is, the visit-to-visit variability for patients initiating treatment for hypertension will be higher than those not initiating treatment because of the effect of treatment. For example, if a patient has systolic BP readings of 143, 139, 145, and 146 mmHg at visits 1 through 4 without antihypertensive medication use (pretreatment: standard deviation=3.1 mm Hg) and 134, 128, 135, and 132 mm Hg at visits 5 through 8 following antihypertensive medication initiation (posttreatment: standard deviation=3.1 mm Hg), the overall standard deviation will be 6.5 mm Hg, which more than doubles from the actual value due to treatment effect. When the effect of treatment is excluded, that is, the post-treatment BP measures were censored, the variability in patients who initiated treatment vs patients always untreated was similar (Figure 1). TROPHY produced a rich set of data that we will continue to analyze according to our sense of priorities. We anticipate that ongoing trials will clarify many questions that TROPHY could not resolve. However, there is a need for additional studies. None of the ongoing trials of prehypertension will discontinue active treatment and thereafter evaluate incident hypertension. We invite Drs Schalkwyk and Turner to join the international community and design an AustralianNew Zealand study that could provide new insights and verify or disprove their assumptions.
منابع مشابه
Blood pressure measurement device, number and timing of visits, and intra-individual visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure.
Visit-to-visit variability (VVV) of blood pressure is associated with cardiovascular disease. The authors examined the effects of visit number and timing and automated or manual measurement device on VVV in the placebo arm of the Trial of Preventing Hypertension (TROPHY) (N=225) and simulations. VVV was assessed using intra-individual standard deviation (SD), range, maximum, coefficient of vari...
متن کاملزمان ویزیت بیماران سرپایی در بیمارستانهای آموزشی شهر اهواز: یک مطالعه کیفی
Background and objective: Proper use of time is essential for an optimal and effective visit. The most important difficulty in managing an outpatient center is the amount of visit time that it is always much lower than expected time. The aim of this study was to compare visit time in Ahvaz teaching hospitals and its standard value and, assessing why and how did this difference create. Method...
متن کاملEvaluating visit quality in plan of health sector evolution in Iran: A local survey from Tabriz
Background and aims: Quality of visit services is a decisive aspect of patient-physician communication that its inadequacy can negatively influence the diagnosis efficiency. The aim of this study was to survey visit quality at provincial level during plan of health sector evolution in Tabriz. Methods: A sample of 540 patients who referred to the outpatien...
متن کاملStudy on changes in some physiological parameters due to presence of visitors at the bedside of patients admitted to coronary care unit at Ali-ibn Abi Talib Hospital of Rafsanjan, Iran, in 2013
Background: Hospitalization in the coronary care unit (CCU) is a concern for patients and their companions. Different studies have presented conflicting results about the effect of visitors on physiological parameters of patients. The purpose of this study was to determine changes in physiological parameters (systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate) due to presence of visitors at t...
متن کاملPopulation Science/Epidemiology The Relationship Between Visit-to-Visit Variability in Systolic Blood Pressure and All-Cause Mortality in the General Population
Recent data suggest that visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure is associated with stroke incidence. Correlates of increased visit-to-visit variability in blood pressure and the relationship between variability and all-cause mortality were examined using data on US adults 20 years of age from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (n 956). Three consecutive blood press...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of clinical hypertension
دوره 15 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013